Which Hyatts Are Most Likely to Get Devalued? A Data-Driven Look

March 27, 2026 | By the Gondola AI Research Team | Data from 1,127,000+ rate observations across 1,927 Hyatt properties

There’s been a lot of speculation about which World of Hyatt properties will get hit hardest under the new award chart. We decided to stop guessing and look at the data instead.

Gondola monitors rates across nearly 2,000 Hyatt properties worldwide. The metric that matters for predicting devaluations is CPP (cents per point): the ratio of what a room costs in cash versus what it costs in points. Higher CPP means Hyatt is giving away more value per point, which means more incentive for Hyatt to raise the points price.

The program-wide median sits at 1.63 cpp. Anything significantly above that means Hyatt is leaving money on the table, and those properties are the most exposed, whether through category changes or aggressive dynamic peak pricing.

The Properties Most at Risk

Tier 1: Near-Certain Targets (Median CPP 3.5+)

These properties are in the top 1.3% of the entire Hyatt portfolio by CPP. The gap between their cash rates and points pricing is enormous.

Property Location Median Cash/Night Points/Night Median CPP Portfolio Rank
Park Hyatt Milano Milan, Italy $1,681 40,000 4.24 #10
Park Hyatt Paris-Vendôme Paris, France $1,625 40,000 4.19 #11
Park Hyatt New York New York, USA $1,436 45,000 4.06 #13
Park Hyatt Maldives Hadahaa Hadahaa, Maldives $932 30,000 3.80 #17
Alila Ventana Big Sur Big Sur, USA $2,285 90,000 3.46 #22
Park Hyatt Kyoto Kyoto, Japan $1,167 45,000 3.37 #25

At 4+ cpp, Park Hyatt Milano and Paris are delivering more than double the program average in redemption value. Under any rational pricing model, these are the first to get repriced.

Tier 2: Strong Pressure (Median CPP 2.5 to 3.5)

Property Location Median Cash/Night Points/Night Median CPP
Park Hyatt Tokyo Tokyo, Japan $1,018 40,000 3.02
Park Hyatt St. Kitts Basseterre, St. Kitts $653 25,000 2.89
Impression Isla Mujeres by Secrets Isla Mujeres, Mexico $1,468 50,000 2.84
Andaz Mayakoba Playa del Carmen, Mexico $556 29,000 2.73
The Beekman (Thompson) New York, USA $563 25,000 2.69
Park Hyatt Zurich Zürich, Switzerland $1,100 40,000 2.68
Park Hyatt Vienna Vienna, Austria $753 30,000 2.64
Hyatt House Tokyo Shibuya Tokyo, Japan $418 20,000 2.51
Andaz Maui Kihei, USA $907 45,000 2.42

Tier 3: Moderate Pressure (421 Properties)

421 properties fall in the 2.0 to 3.0 cpp range. These likely won’t see category changes, but expect more peak and super-peak pricing on high-demand dates. The new chart structure gives Hyatt enough pricing tiers to capture this value without moving categories.

The Japan Deep Dive

Japan is the most-discussed market in the devaluation conversation, and for good reason. Tourism demand has pushed cash rates well above points pricing at premium properties. But the exposure isn’t uniform.

Property City Median CPP Cash/Night Points/Night
Park Hyatt Kyoto Kyoto 3.37 $1,167 45,000
Park Hyatt Tokyo Tokyo 3.02 $1,018 40,000
Hyatt House Tokyo Shibuya Tokyo 2.51 $418 20,000
Hyatt Centric Ginza Tokyo Tokyo 2.28 $571 30,000
Grand Hyatt Fukuoka Fukuoka 2.15 $252 15,000
Andaz Tokyo Toranomon Hills Tokyo 1.96 $656 40,000
Hyatt House Kanazawa Kanazawa 1.94 $126 8,000
Caption by Hyatt Namba Osaka Osaka 1.81 $129 9,500
Hyatt Regency Yokohama Yokohama 1.74 $169 12,000
Hyatt Regency Tokyo Tokyo 1.72 $275 20,000
Hyatt Regency Hakone Hakone 1.70 $348 25,000
Hyatt Place Kyoto Kyoto 1.66 $117 9,500
Hotel Toranomon Hills (Unbound) Tokyo 1.65 $436 30,000
Hyatt Centric Kanazawa Kanazawa 1.58 $142 12,000
Grand Hyatt Tokyo Tokyo 1.44 $464 40,000
Hyatt Regency Naha, Okinawa Naha 1.33 $136 12,000
Hyatt Regency Kyoto Kyoto 1.19 $253 29,000
Park Hyatt Niseko Hanazono Kutchan 0.98 $294 40,000

Park Hyatt Kyoto and Tokyo are clearly exposed. But most Japan properties below 2.0 cpp are priced fairly relative to their cash rates. Andaz Tokyo (1.96 cpp) is not as overvalued as people assume. It’s already close to fair. And Park Hyatt Niseko at just 0.98 cpp is actually underpriced in cash relative to its points cost.

Properties That Are Probably Safe

Grand Cypress Orlando

Someone on Reddit called Grand Cypress the “Costco Hot Dog” of Hyatt, and the data backs it up. It’s a solid deal that probably isn’t going anywhere.

Metric Value
Median CPP 1.94
Median Cash $241/night
Points/Night 15,000
Portfolio Rank #536 of 1,927

At 1.94 cpp, Grand Cypress is close to fair value for a Cat 4. Cash rates at $241/night are solidly within Cat 4 territory. Its role as a conference hotel and the fact that it’s not walking distance to the parks likely keeps it anchored.

Alila Villas Uluwatu

At 2.00 cpp (rank #475 of 1,927), Uluwatu is firmly middle-of-the-pack. Not enough of a gap between cash and points to justify a devaluation.

Secrets Akumal

At 2.09 cpp (rank #404), the all-inclusive pricing absorbs much of the cash rate premium. Low risk for a significant move.

Hyatt Regency Boston

At 1.69 cpp (rank #1,196 of 1,927), this one gets called out as a Cat 5 that “should be a 4.” The data agrees. There’s zero upward pressure here. If anything, the chart reset could push it down.

The Big Picture

Pressure Level CPP Range Properties % of Portfolio
Extreme > 5.0 4 0.2%
Strong 3.0 to 5.0 49 2.5%
Moderate 2.0 to 3.0 421 21.8%
Fair value 1.5 to 2.0 659 34.2%
Safe / undervalued < 1.5 774 40.2%

40% of the Hyatt portfolio is currently at or below fair value. Only about 50 properties (roughly 2.5%) face strong devaluation pressure, and just 4 are in the extreme category. The new dynamic pricing tiers give Hyatt the tools to capture value on peak dates without needing to move categories, which is exactly what they said the chart changes were designed to do.

Our Prediction

The Park Hyatts (Milano, Paris, New York, Kyoto, Tokyo, Maldives), Ventana Big Sur, and the Jamaica all-inclusives will see the most aggressive dynamic pricing. Actual category changes should be limited thanks to the new tier structure, but the effective cost of staying at these properties during peak season will likely climb 30 to 50% through super-peak pricing.

The silver lining: shoulder season and off-peak dates should still offer strong value at most properties. For the 40% of properties currently at or below 1.5 cpp, the chart change may actually be neutral, or even beneficial if some Cat 5s drop to Cat 4.

If you’re planning a trip to any of these properties, book sooner rather than later. Points pricing tends to ratchet up, not down.

Methodology

This analysis is based on 1,127,000+ rate observations across 1,927 Hyatt properties worldwide, collected via Gondola’s hotel rate monitoring platform (pipeline run March 16, 2026). CPP (cents per point) is calculated as cash rate in USD divided by points cost, multiplied by 100. Cash rates were converted to USD using live exchange rates. Observations were filtered to valid, non-anomalous rates. Median CPP is used as the primary metric to reduce the impact of outlier pricing on individual dates.

Powered by Gondola, the tool built for frequent travelers to earn the most money and save the most money on travel.

Leave a Reply

Scroll to Top

Discover more from GONDOLA

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading